Umami vs Matomo
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while Matomo is open-source web analytics platform that gives you full control over your data. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas Matomo targets organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy.
At a glance
|
Umami
|
Matomo
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics | Organizations wanting full Google Analytics replacement with privacy |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| Custom Events | ✓ | — |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| Heatmaps | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-Time Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | ✓ |
Umami
Strengths
- Free and open source
- Easy to self-host (Docker, Vercel, Railway)
- Clean, modern dashboard
- Privacy-focused, no cookies
Weaknesses
- Requires self-hosting for free use
- Fewer features than GA or even Plausible
- Limited integrations
- Cloud pricing not competitive with Plausible
Matomo
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
- Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Umami and Matomo are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Umami offers Cookieless, Custom Events and Real-Time Dashboard that Matomo lacks. Matomo brings GDPR and Heatmaps that Umami does not have. Both share Open Source and Self-Hosted.
Team fit: Umami is geared toward individual users and small setups, while Matomo is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Both Umami and Matomo are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Umami's biggest strengths are: free and open source. easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway). Matomo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development.
Watch out for: With Umami, users commonly note that requires self-hosting for free use. With Matomo, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Umami if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics
- You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events
- You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway)
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for
Choose Matomo if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy
- You specifically need GDPR and Heatmaps
- You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
- Your team size fits the any size profile Matomo is designed for
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.