Umami vs June
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while June is product analytics specifically designed for B2B SaaS with company-level insights. Umami is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas June targets b2b saas teams wanting product analytics built for them.
At a glance
|
Umami
|
June
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics | B2B SaaS teams wanting product analytics built for them |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Activation | — | ✓ |
| Company Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| Custom Events | ✓ | — |
| Feature Reports | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Retention | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
Umami
Strengths
- Free and open source
- Easy to self-host (Docker, Vercel, Railway)
- Clean, modern dashboard
- Privacy-focused, no cookies
Weaknesses
- Requires self-hosting for free use
- Fewer features than GA or even Plausible
- Limited integrations
- Cloud pricing not competitive with Plausible
June
Strengths
- Includes Company Analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Includes Feature Reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Free for 1K monthly users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes activation alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Umami and June are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.
Feature gaps: Umami offers Cookieless, Custom Events and Open Source that June lacks. June brings Activation, Company Analytics and Feature Reports that Umami does not have.
Team fit: Umami is geared toward individual users and small setups, while June is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Umami is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. June is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Umami's biggest strengths are: free and open source. easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway). June's biggest strengths are: includes company analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows.
Watch out for: With Umami, users commonly note that requires self-hosting for free use. With June, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Umami if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events
- You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway)
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for
Choose June if...
- You need a tool built for b2b saas teams wanting product analytics built for them
- You specifically need Activation and Company Analytics
- You care about includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Your team size fits the small teams profile June is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for 1k monthly users
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.