At a glance

PostHog Hotjar
Best for Product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool Teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
A/B Testing
Feature Flags
Funnels
Heatmaps
Product Analytics
Session Recordings
Session Replay
Surveys

PostHog

Strengths

  • All-in-one: analytics, session replay, feature flags, A/B tests
  • Generous free tier (1M events/mo)
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Strong developer experience

Weaknesses

  • Can be overwhelming — lots of features
  • Self-hosting requires significant infrastructure
  • UI has a learning curve
  • Some features less mature than best-in-class alternatives

Hotjar

Strengths

  • Includes Heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Includes Session Recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Free for 35 sessions/day — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 12+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Both PostHog and Hotjar are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: PostHog offers A/B Testing, Feature Flags and Product Analytics that Hotjar lacks. Hotjar brings Funnels, Heatmaps and Session Recordings that PostHog does not have. Both share Surveys.

Team fit: PostHog is geared toward any size teams, while Hotjar is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: PostHog is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Hotjar is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: PostHog's biggest strengths are: all-in-one: analytics, session replay, feature flags, a/b tests. generous free tier (1m events/mo). Hotjar's biggest strengths are: includes heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows.

Watch out for: With PostHog, users commonly note that can be overwhelming — lots of features. With Hotjar, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose PostHog if...

  • You need a tool built for product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need A/B Testing and Feature Flags
  • You care about generous free tier (1m events/mo)
  • Your team size fits the any size profile PostHog is designed for

Choose Hotjar if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings
  • You specifically need Funnels and Heatmaps
  • You care about includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Hotjar is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 35 sessions/day

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more