Penpot vs Whimsical
Penpot is open-source, browser-based design and prototyping platform. Self-hostable, while Whimsical is visual workspace for wireframes, flowcharts, mind maps, and sticky notes. Penpot is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Penpot is built for teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative, whereas Whimsical targets teams wanting fast wireframing and flowcharts.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that want a free, open-source Figma alternative | Teams wanting fast wireframing and flowcharts |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| AI Suggestions | — | ✓ |
| Components | ✓ | — |
| Flowcharts | — | ✓ |
| Mind Maps | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Prototyping | ✓ | — |
| SVG Native | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Wireframes | — | ✓ |
Penpot
Strengths
- 100% free and open source
- Self-hostable for data sovereignty
- Real-time collaboration like Figma
- Uses open standards (SVG)
Weaknesses
- Less mature than Figma — fewer features
- Smaller plugin and community ecosystem
- Performance not as smooth as Figma
- Fewer design resources and templates available
Whimsical
Strengths
- Dedicated wireframing tools speed up early-stage design exploration
- Includes Flowcharts as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
- Free for 100 items — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes mind maps alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Penpot and Whimsical are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.
Feature gaps: Penpot offers Components, Open Source and Prototyping that Whimsical lacks. Whimsical brings AI Suggestions, Flowcharts and Mind Maps that Penpot does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Penpot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Whimsical is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Penpot's biggest strengths are: 100% free and open source. self-hostable for data sovereignty. Whimsical's biggest strengths are: dedicated wireframing tools speed up early-stage design exploration. includes flowcharts as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows.
Watch out for: With Penpot, users commonly note that less mature than figma — fewer features. With Whimsical, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Penpot if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Components and Open Source
- You care about self-hostable for data sovereignty
Choose Whimsical if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting fast wireframing and flowcharts
- You specifically need AI Suggestions and Flowcharts
- You care about includes flowcharts as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 100 items
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.