Penpot vs Miro
Penpot is open-source, browser-based design and prototyping platform. Self-hostable, while Miro is online collaborative whiteboard platform for brainstorming, planning, and design. The biggest difference up front: Penpot is free, while Miro starts at $8/user/mo. Penpot is built for teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative, whereas Miro targets teams that need visual collaboration and whiteboarding.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that want a free, open-source Figma alternative | Teams that need visual collaboration and whiteboarding |
| Starting price | Free | $8/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Components | ✓ | — |
| Diagramming | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Prototyping | ✓ | — |
| SVG Native | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Sticky Notes | — | ✓ |
| Templates | — | ✓ |
| Voting | — | ✓ |
| Whiteboards | — | ✓ |
Penpot
Strengths
- 100% free and open source
- Self-hostable for data sovereignty
- Real-time collaboration like Figma
- Uses open standards (SVG)
Weaknesses
- Less mature than Figma — fewer features
- Smaller plugin and community ecosystem
- Performance not as smooth as Figma
- Fewer design resources and templates available
Miro
Strengths
- Includes Whiteboards as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
- Huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more
- 3 free boards — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 15+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Feature-rich interface takes time to learn — not the simplest option for quick adoption
- Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
The bottom line
Pricing: Penpot is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Miro starts at $8/user/mo, but 3 free boards. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Penpot offers Components, Open Source and Prototyping that Miro lacks. Miro brings Diagramming, Sticky Notes and Templates that Penpot does not have.
Team fit: Penpot is geared toward small teams teams, while Miro is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Penpot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Miro is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Penpot's biggest strengths are: 100% free and open source. self-hostable for data sovereignty. Miro's biggest strengths are: includes whiteboards as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows. huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more.
Watch out for: With Penpot, users commonly note that less mature than figma — fewer features. With Miro, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Penpot if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative
- Budget is a hard constraint — Penpot is free, Miro is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Components and Open Source
- You care about self-hostable for data sovereignty
Choose Miro if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that need visual collaboration and whiteboarding
- You specifically need Diagramming and Sticky Notes
- You care about huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more
- Your team size fits the any size profile Miro is designed for
- The free tier works for you: 3 free boards
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.