At a glance

Penpot Miro
Best for Teams that want a free, open-source Figma alternative Teams that need visual collaboration and whiteboarding
Starting price Free $8/user/mo
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Components
Diagramming
Open Source
Prototyping
SVG Native
Self-Hosted
Sticky Notes
Templates
Voting
Whiteboards

Penpot

Strengths

  • 100% free and open source
  • Self-hostable for data sovereignty
  • Real-time collaboration like Figma
  • Uses open standards (SVG)

Weaknesses

  • Less mature than Figma — fewer features
  • Smaller plugin and community ecosystem
  • Performance not as smooth as Figma
  • Fewer design resources and templates available

Miro

Strengths

  • Includes Whiteboards as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
  • Huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more
  • 3 free boards — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 15+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Feature-rich interface takes time to learn — not the simplest option for quick adoption
  • Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
  • Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish

The bottom line

Pricing: Penpot is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Miro starts at $8/user/mo, but 3 free boards. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.

Feature gaps: Penpot offers Components, Open Source and Prototyping that Miro lacks. Miro brings Diagramming, Sticky Notes and Templates that Penpot does not have.

Team fit: Penpot is geared toward small teams teams, while Miro is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Penpot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Miro is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Penpot's biggest strengths are: 100% free and open source. self-hostable for data sovereignty. Miro's biggest strengths are: includes whiteboards as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows. huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more.

Watch out for: With Penpot, users commonly note that less mature than figma — fewer features. With Miro, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Penpot if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative
  • Budget is a hard constraint — Penpot is free, Miro is not
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Components and Open Source
  • You care about self-hostable for data sovereignty

Choose Miro if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that need visual collaboration and whiteboarding
  • You specifically need Diagramming and Sticky Notes
  • You care about huge template library covers social media, presentations, marketing materials, and more
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Miro is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: 3 free boards

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more