At a glance

Penpot InVision
Best for Teams that want a free, open-source Figma alternative Teams needing design feedback workflows
Starting price Free $7.95/mo
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Components
Design Systems
Freehand
Inspect
Open Source
Prototyping
SVG Native
Self-Hosted

Penpot

Strengths

  • 100% free and open source
  • Self-hostable for data sovereignty
  • Real-time collaboration like Figma
  • Uses open standards (SVG)

Weaknesses

  • Less mature than Figma — fewer features
  • Smaller plugin and community ecosystem
  • Performance not as smooth as Figma
  • Fewer design resources and templates available

InVision

Strengths

  • Interactive prototyping with transitions so stakeholders can click through realistic mockups
  • Includes Design Systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
  • Free for 1 prototype — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 15+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
  • Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish

The bottom line

Pricing: Penpot is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. InVision starts at $7.95/mo, but Free for 1 prototype. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.

Feature gaps: Penpot offers Components, Open Source and SVG Native that InVision lacks. InVision brings Design Systems, Freehand and Inspect that Penpot does not have. Both share Prototyping.

Team fit: Penpot is geared toward small teams teams, while InVision is aimed at mid-size teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Penpot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. InVision is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Penpot's biggest strengths are: 100% free and open source. self-hostable for data sovereignty. InVision's biggest strengths are: interactive prototyping with transitions so stakeholders can click through realistic mockups. includes design systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows.

Watch out for: With Penpot, users commonly note that less mature than figma — fewer features. With InVision, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Penpot if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative
  • Budget is a hard constraint — Penpot is free, InVision is not
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Components and Open Source
  • You care about self-hostable for data sovereignty

Choose InVision if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams needing design feedback workflows
  • You specifically need Design Systems and Freehand
  • You care about includes design systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
  • Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile InVision is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 1 prototype

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more