At a glance

Zapier Activepieces
Best for Non-technical users who want to automate workflows between apps Teams wanting open-source workflow automation
Starting price $19.99/mo Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
100+ Integrations
App Integrations
Code Steps
Filters
Multi-Step Zaps
Self-Hosted
Triggers
Visual Builder
Webhooks

Zapier

Strengths

  • Largest app integration library (6,000+)
  • Easy to use for non-technical users
  • Reliable and well-maintained
  • Good documentation and templates

Weaknesses

  • Expensive at scale — per-task pricing adds up
  • Free tier very limited (100 tasks/mo)
  • Multi-step zaps require paid plan
  • Execution speed can be slow (polling-based)

Activepieces

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Includes Visual Builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API

The bottom line

Pricing: Activepieces is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Zapier starts at $19.99/mo, but Free for 100 tasks/month, 5 zaps. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.

Feature gaps: Zapier offers App Integrations, Filters and Multi-Step Zaps that Activepieces lacks. Activepieces brings 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Self-Hosted that Zapier does not have.

Team fit: Zapier is geared toward any size teams, while Activepieces is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Zapier is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Zapier's biggest strengths are: largest app integration library (6,000+). easy to use for non-technical users. Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.

Watch out for: With Zapier, users commonly note that expensive at scale — per-task pricing adds up. With Activepieces, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose Zapier if...

  • You need a tool built for non-technical users who want to automate workflows between apps
  • You specifically need App Integrations and Filters
  • You care about easy to use for non-technical users
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Zapier is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 100 tasks/month, 5 zaps

Choose Activepieces if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
  • Budget is a hard constraint — Activepieces is free, Zapier is not
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
  • You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more