Zapier vs Activepieces
Zapier is no-code automation platform connecting 6,000+ apps with triggers and actions, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. The biggest difference up front: Activepieces is free, while Zapier starts at $19.99/mo. Zapier is built for non-technical users who want to automate workflows between apps, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Non-technical users who want to automate workflows between apps | Teams wanting open-source workflow automation |
| Starting price | $19.99/mo | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| 100+ Integrations | — | ✓ |
| App Integrations | ✓ | — |
| Code Steps | — | ✓ |
| Filters | ✓ | — |
| Multi-Step Zaps | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
| Triggers | ✓ | — |
| Visual Builder | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
Zapier
Strengths
- Largest app integration library (6,000+)
- Easy to use for non-technical users
- Reliable and well-maintained
- Good documentation and templates
Weaknesses
- Expensive at scale — per-task pricing adds up
- Free tier very limited (100 tasks/mo)
- Multi-step zaps require paid plan
- Execution speed can be slow (polling-based)
Activepieces
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Visual Builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
- Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API
The bottom line
Pricing: Activepieces is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Zapier starts at $19.99/mo, but Free for 100 tasks/month, 5 zaps. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Zapier offers App Integrations, Filters and Multi-Step Zaps that Activepieces lacks. Activepieces brings 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Self-Hosted that Zapier does not have.
Team fit: Zapier is geared toward any size teams, while Activepieces is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Zapier is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Zapier's biggest strengths are: largest app integration library (6,000+). easy to use for non-technical users. Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
Watch out for: With Zapier, users commonly note that expensive at scale — per-task pricing adds up. With Activepieces, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Zapier if...
- You need a tool built for non-technical users who want to automate workflows between apps
- You specifically need App Integrations and Filters
- You care about easy to use for non-technical users
- Your team size fits the any size profile Zapier is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for 100 tasks/month, 5 zaps
Choose Activepieces if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
- Budget is a hard constraint — Activepieces is free, Zapier is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
- You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.