Vultr vs Linode (Akamai)
Vultr is cloud infrastructure with compute, storage, and Kubernetes across 30+ global locations, while Linode (Akamai) is cloud hosting provider with virtual machines, Kubernetes, and managed databases. Vultr comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Vultr is built for developers wanting affordable cloud across 30+ locations, whereas Linode (Akamai) targets developers wanting straightforward linux cloud hosting.
At a glance
|
Vultr
|
Linode (Akamai)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers wanting affordable cloud across 30+ locations | Developers wanting straightforward Linux cloud hosting |
| Starting price | $2.50/mo | $5/mo |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Bare Metal | ✓ | — |
| Cloud Compute | ✓ | — |
| Global | ✓ | — |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linux VMs | — | ✓ |
| Managed DBs | — | ✓ |
| Object Storage | — | ✓ |
Vultr
Strengths
- Includes Cloud Compute as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
- Includes Kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
- Affordable at $2.50/mo — one of the lower-priced options in the cloud hosting category
- Established product with 12+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- No free plan — you need to pay $2.50/mo from day one to use it
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Costs can spike unexpectedly during traffic surges if limits aren't configured
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
Linode (Akamai)
Strengths
- Includes Linux VMs as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
- Includes Kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
- Affordable at $5/mo — one of the lower-priced options in the cloud hosting category
- Established product with 23+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- No free plan — you need to pay $5/mo from day one to use it
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Costs can spike unexpectedly during traffic surges if limits aren't configured
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Vultr starts at $2.50/mo. Linode (Akamai) starts at $5/mo. Vultr is the more affordable option.
Feature gaps: Vultr offers Bare Metal, Cloud Compute and Global that Linode (Akamai) lacks. Linode (Akamai) brings Linux VMs, Managed DBs and Object Storage that Vultr does not have. Both share Kubernetes.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Where each tool shines: Vultr's biggest strengths are: includes cloud compute as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows. includes kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows. Linode (Akamai)'s biggest strengths are: includes linux vms as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows. includes kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows.
Watch out for: With Vultr, users commonly note that no free plan — you need to pay $2.50/mo from day one to use it. With Linode (Akamai), the main complaint is that no free plan — you need to pay $5/mo from day one to use it.
Choose Vultr if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting affordable cloud across 30+ locations
- You want to save on per-user costs — Vultr is $2.50/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Bare Metal and Cloud Compute
- You care about includes kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
Choose Linode (Akamai) if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting straightforward linux cloud hosting
- You specifically need Linux VMs and Managed DBs
- You care about includes kubernetes as a core feature, purpose-built for cloud hosting workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.