Turso vs Hasura
Turso is edge-hosted distributed database built on libSQL (SQLite fork) for ultra-low latency reads, while Hasura is Instant GraphQL and REST APIs on Postgres, SQL Server, and other data sources. Turso is built for developers wanting sqlite at the edge, whereas Hasura targets developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database.
At a glance
|
Turso
|
Hasura
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers wanting SQLite at the edge | Developers wanting instant GraphQL APIs on their database |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auth | — | ✓ |
| Branching | ✓ | — |
| Edge SQLite | ✓ | — |
| Embedded Replicas | ✓ | — |
| GraphQL | — | ✓ |
| Multi-Region | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time | — | ✓ |
| Remote Schemas | — | ✓ |
Turso
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Edge SQLite as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- Free 9 GB total storage — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in database
- Community support can be slower than the dedicated support teams at commercial alternatives
Hasura
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes GraphQL as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- Free for 1 project — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in database
- Community support can be slower than the dedicated support teams at commercial alternatives
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Turso's free plan: Free 9 GB total storage. Hasura's free plan: Free for 1 project.
Feature gaps: Turso offers Branching, Edge SQLite and Embedded Replicas that Hasura lacks. Hasura brings Auth, GraphQL and Real-Time that Turso does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Both Turso and Hasura are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Turso's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes edge sqlite as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows. Hasura's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows.
Watch out for: With Turso, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Hasura, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Turso if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting sqlite at the edge
- You specifically need Branching and Edge SQLite
- You care about includes edge sqlite as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
- The free tier works for you: free 9 gb total storage
Choose Hasura if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database
- You specifically need Auth and GraphQL
- You care about includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 1 project
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.