At a glance

tldraw Eraser
Best for Developers wanting an embeddable whiteboard canvas Engineering teams creating architecture diagrams and technical documentation
Starting price Free Free
Free tier ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ —
Free tier available ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ —
AI generation — ✓
Architecture diagrams — ✓
Diagram-as-code — ✓
Embeddable ✓ —
Multiplayer ✓ —
Open Source ✓ —
SDK ✓ —
Technical docs — ✓

tldraw

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in diagramming

Eraser

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for technical and architecture diagrams
  • Diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions
  • Combines diagrams with technical documentation
  • AI-powered diagram generation from natural language

Weaknesses

  • Narrow focus — not for general brainstorming or design
  • Smaller community than Excalidraw or Miro
  • Some features still in development
  • Limited template library compared to Lucidchart

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tldraw and Eraser are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.

Feature gaps: tldraw offers Embeddable, Multiplayer and Open Source that Eraser lacks. Eraser brings AI generation, Architecture diagrams and Diagram-as-code that tldraw does not have.

Open source: tldraw is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Eraser is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: tldraw's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development. Eraser's biggest strengths are: purpose-built for technical and architecture diagrams. diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions.

Watch out for: With tldraw, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Eraser, the main complaint is that narrow focus — not for general brainstorming or design.

Choose tldraw if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting an embeddable whiteboard canvas
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Embeddable and Multiplayer
  • You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development

Choose Eraser if...

  • You need a tool built for engineering teams creating architecture diagrams and technical documentation
  • You specifically need AI generation and Architecture diagrams
  • You care about diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more