At a glance

tldraw Eraser
Best for Developers wanting an embeddable whiteboard canvas Engineering teams creating architecture diagrams and technical documentation
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
AI generation
Architecture diagrams
Diagram-as-code
Embeddable
Multiplayer
Open Source
SDK
Technical docs

tldraw

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in diagramming

Eraser

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for technical and architecture diagrams
  • Diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions
  • Combines diagrams with technical documentation
  • AI-powered diagram generation from natural language

Weaknesses

  • Narrow focus — not for general brainstorming or design
  • Smaller community than Excalidraw or Miro
  • Some features still in development
  • Limited template library compared to Lucidchart

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tldraw and Eraser are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.

Feature gaps: tldraw offers Embeddable, Multiplayer and Open Source that Eraser lacks. Eraser brings AI generation, Architecture diagrams and Diagram-as-code that tldraw does not have.

Open source: tldraw is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Eraser is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: tldraw's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development. Eraser's biggest strengths are: purpose-built for technical and architecture diagrams. diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions.

Watch out for: With tldraw, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Eraser, the main complaint is that narrow focus — not for general brainstorming or design.

Choose tldraw if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting an embeddable whiteboard canvas
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Embeddable and Multiplayer
  • You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development

Choose Eraser if...

  • You need a tool built for engineering teams creating architecture diagrams and technical documentation
  • You specifically need AI generation and Architecture diagrams
  • You care about diagram-as-code generates visuals from text descriptions

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more