Supabase vs PlanetScale
Supabase is Open-source Firebase alternative providing a Postgres database, authentication, storage, and edge functions, while PlanetScale is Serverless MySQL platform with branching, non-blocking schema changes, and unlimited scalability. Supabase comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Supabase is built for developers who want a full backend with postgres at the core, whereas PlanetScale targets teams running mysql at scale who need safe schema migrations.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers who want a full backend with Postgres at the core | Teams running MySQL at scale who need safe schema migrations |
| Starting price | $25/mo | $39/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | — |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | — |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Auth | ✓ | — |
| Auto-scaling | — | ✓ |
| Database Branching | — | ✓ |
| Edge Functions | ✓ | — |
| Postgres | ✓ | — |
| Query Insights | — | ✓ |
| Realtime | ✓ | — |
| Schema Migrations | — | ✓ |
| Storage | ✓ | — |
Supabase
Strengths
- Full Postgres database with SQL access and extensions
- Open source with self-hosting option for full control
- Built-in auth, storage, and realtime subscriptions
- Generous free tier for prototyping and small projects
Weaknesses
- Free tier pauses inactive projects after one week
- Edge functions are still maturing compared to alternatives
- Connection pooling can be tricky at scale
- Dashboard can feel overwhelming with many features
PlanetScale
Strengths
- Git-like branching for safe schema changes
- Non-blocking schema migrations with zero downtime
- Built on Vitess for proven horizontal scalability
- Excellent developer experience and CLI tools
Weaknesses
- No free tier — minimum $39/month commitment
- No foreign key constraint support by default
- MySQL only — no Postgres option
- Vendor lock-in with proprietary branching features
The bottom line
Pricing: Supabase starts at $25/mo. PlanetScale starts at $39/mo. Supabase is the more affordable option.
Feature gaps: Supabase offers Auth, Edge Functions and Postgres that PlanetScale lacks. PlanetScale brings Auto-scaling, Database Branching and Query Insights that Supabase does not have.
Team fit: Supabase is geared toward any size teams, while PlanetScale is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Supabase is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. PlanetScale is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Supabase's biggest strengths are: full postgres database with sql access and extensions. open source with self-hosting option for full control. PlanetScale's biggest strengths are: git-like branching for safe schema changes. non-blocking schema migrations with zero downtime.
Watch out for: With Supabase, users commonly note that free tier pauses inactive projects after one week. With PlanetScale, the main complaint is that no free tier — minimum $39/month commitment.
Choose Supabase if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want a full backend with postgres at the core
- You want to save on per-user costs — Supabase is $14.00/user/mo cheaper
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Auth and Edge Functions
- You care about open source with self-hosting option for full control
Choose PlanetScale if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams running mysql at scale who need safe schema migrations
- You specifically need Auto-scaling and Database Branching
- You care about non-blocking schema migrations with zero downtime
- Your team size fits the small teams profile PlanetScale is designed for
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.