Shortcut vs Teamwork
Shortcut is project management for software teams with a focus on simplicity and collaboration, while Teamwork is project management with time tracking, resource management, and client-facing features. Teamwork comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Shortcut is built for mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light, whereas Teamwork targets client-facing teams needing project + time tracking.
At a glance
|
Shortcut
|
Teamwork
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Mid-size software teams that find Jira too heavy and Trello too light | Client-facing teams needing project + time tracking |
| Starting price | $8.50/user/mo | $5.99/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| API | ✓ | — |
| Budgets | — | ✓ |
| Client Access | — | ✓ |
| Epics | ✓ | — |
| Iterations | ✓ | — |
| Milestones | ✓ | — |
| Stories | ✓ | — |
| Templates | — | ✓ |
| Time Tracking | — | ✓ |
Shortcut
Strengths
- Right balance of features without Jira's complexity
- Clean, intuitive interface
- Good API and integrations
- Generous free tier
Weaknesses
- Smaller market share means less community content
- Fewer advanced reporting features than Jira
- Brand confusion from name change (was Clubhouse)
- Limited customization compared to Jira
Teamwork
Strengths
- Native time tracking eliminates the need for a separate time-logging tool
- Includes Budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- Free for 5 users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 19+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Migrating existing projects from another tool can be time-consuming
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Shortcut's free plan: Free for up to 10 users. Teamwork's free plan: Free for 5 users. When you outgrow the free tier, Teamwork is the cheaper option at $5.99/user/mo vs. $8.50/user/mo for Shortcut — roughly 41% less.
Feature gaps: Shortcut offers API, Epics and Iterations that Teamwork lacks. Teamwork brings Budgets, Client Access and Templates that Shortcut does not have.
Team fit: Shortcut is geared toward small teams teams, while Teamwork is aimed at mid-size teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Where each tool shines: Shortcut's biggest strengths are: right balance of features without jira's complexity. clean, intuitive interface. Teamwork's biggest strengths are: native time tracking eliminates the need for a separate time-logging tool. includes budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows.
Watch out for: With Shortcut, users commonly note that smaller market share means less community content. With Teamwork, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Shortcut if...
- You need a tool built for mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light
- You specifically need API and Epics
- You care about clean, intuitive interface
- Your team size fits the small teams profile Shortcut is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users
Choose Teamwork if...
- You need a tool built for client-facing teams needing project + time tracking
- You want to save on per-user costs — Teamwork is $2.51/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Budgets and Client Access
- You care about includes budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Teamwork is designed for
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.