SEMrush vs SE Ranking
SEMrush is all-in-one digital marketing platform with SEO, advertising, content, and competitive research, while SE Ranking is All-in-one SEO platform with rank tracking, site audits, and competitor analysis at an affordable price. SE Ranking comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. SEMrush is built for digital marketing teams wanting seo, ppc, and content tools, whereas SE Ranking targets small agencies and marketers who need ahrefs-level features at a lower price.
At a glance
|
SEMrush
|
SE Ranking | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Digital marketing teams wanting SEO, PPC, and content tools | Small agencies and marketers who need Ahrefs-level features at a lower price |
| Starting price | $129.95/mo | $44/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Backlink analysis | — | ✓ |
| Competitor Analysis | ✓ | — |
| Competitor analysis | — | ✓ |
| Content Marketing | ✓ | — |
| Keyword Research | ✓ | — |
| Keyword research | — | ✓ |
| PPC | ✓ | — |
| Rank tracking | — | ✓ |
| Site audit | — | ✓ |
SEMrush
Strengths
- Includes Keyword Research as a core feature, purpose-built for seo workflows
- Includes Competitor Analysis as a core feature, purpose-built for seo workflows
- Free with limited searches — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 18+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan has meaningful restrictions: free with limited searches
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in seo
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
SE Ranking
Strengths
- Significantly cheaper than Ahrefs and SEMrush
- Comprehensive feature set covering all SEO workflows
- Accurate rank tracking with daily updates
- White-label reporting for agencies
Weaknesses
- Smaller keyword database than Ahrefs or SEMrush
- Backlink index is less comprehensive
- Interface can feel cluttered with features
- Less brand recognition among enterprise clients
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. SEMrush's free plan: Free with limited searches. SE Ranking's free plan: 14-day free trial. When you outgrow the free tier, SE Ranking is the cheaper option at $44/mo vs. $129.95/mo for SEMrush — roughly 195% less.
Feature gaps: SEMrush offers Competitor Analysis, Content Marketing and Keyword Research that SE Ranking lacks. SE Ranking brings Backlink analysis, Competitor analysis and Keyword research that SEMrush does not have.
Where each tool shines: SEMrush's biggest strengths are: includes keyword research as a core feature, purpose-built for seo workflows. includes competitor analysis as a core feature, purpose-built for seo workflows. SE Ranking's biggest strengths are: significantly cheaper than ahrefs and semrush. comprehensive feature set covering all seo workflows.
Watch out for: With SEMrush, users commonly note that free plan has meaningful restrictions: free with limited searches. With SE Ranking, the main complaint is that smaller keyword database than ahrefs or semrush.
Choose SEMrush if...
- You need a tool built for digital marketing teams wanting seo, ppc, and content tools
- You specifically need Competitor Analysis and Content Marketing
- You care about includes competitor analysis as a core feature, purpose-built for seo workflows
- The free tier works for you: free with limited searches
Choose SE Ranking if...
- You need a tool built for small agencies and marketers who need ahrefs-level features at a lower price
- You want to save on per-user costs — SE Ranking is $85.95/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Backlink analysis and Competitor analysis
- You care about comprehensive feature set covering all seo workflows
- The free tier works for you: 14-day free trial
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.