At a glance

Rocket.Chat Flock
Best for Teams that want self-hosted chat with customer-facing features Teams wanting messaging with built-in productivity tools
Starting price Free (self-hosted) Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Bots
Federation
Notes
Omnichannel
Polls
Self-Hosted
To-Dos
Video Calls

Rocket.Chat

Strengths

  • Self-hosted with full data ownership
  • Combines internal chat and customer-facing messaging
  • Active open-source community
  • Federation support for cross-organization chat

Weaknesses

  • UI feels dated compared to Slack
  • Self-hosting requires significant DevOps effort
  • Fewer integrations than mainstream alternatives
  • Can be resource-intensive to run

Flock

Strengths

  • Lightweight to-do lists keep daily tasks front and center without project-management overhead
  • Includes Polls as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Free for up to 20 users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 12+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Notification overload is a real problem as the number of channels grows
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Rocket.Chat and Flock are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Rocket.Chat offers Bots, Federation and Omnichannel that Flock lacks. Flock brings Notes, Polls and To-Dos that Rocket.Chat does not have. Both share Video Calls.

Team fit: Rocket.Chat is geared toward mid-size teams teams, while Flock is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Rocket.Chat is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Flock is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Rocket.Chat's biggest strengths are: self-hosted with full data ownership. combines internal chat and customer-facing messaging. Flock's biggest strengths are: lightweight to-do lists keep daily tasks front and center without project-management overhead. includes polls as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows.

Watch out for: With Rocket.Chat, users commonly note that ui feels dated compared to slack. With Flock, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Rocket.Chat if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want self-hosted chat with customer-facing features
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Bots and Federation
  • You care about combines internal chat and customer-facing messaging
  • Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Rocket.Chat is designed for

Choose Flock if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting messaging with built-in productivity tools
  • You specifically need Notes and Polls
  • You care about includes polls as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Flock is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for up to 20 users

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more