Plane vs Wrike
Plane is open-source project management tool for software teams. Self-hostable alternative to Jira and Linear, while Wrike is enterprise work management with Gantt charts, resource management, and proofing tools. Plane is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Plane is built for teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management, whereas Wrike targets professional services teams needing resource management.
At a glance
|
Plane
|
Wrike
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management | Professional services teams needing resource management |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Custom Workflows | — | ✓ |
| Cycles | ✓ | — |
| Gantt Charts | — | ✓ |
| Modules | ✓ | — |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Proofing | — | ✓ |
| Resource Management | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Views | ✓ | — |
Plane
Strengths
- Open source and self-hostable
- Clean, modern interface inspired by Linear
- Free for unlimited users (self-hosted)
- Active development and growing community
Weaknesses
- Less mature than established alternatives
- Fewer integrations
- Self-hosting requires infrastructure management
- Some features still in development
Wrike
Strengths
- Gantt charts visualize project timelines with task dependencies at a glance
- Includes Resource Management as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- Free for basic use — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 20+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Enterprise-focused design means the interface can feel heavy for smaller teams
- Migrating existing projects from another tool can be time-consuming
- Overkill for freelancers or small teams who need something lightweight
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Plane and Wrike are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.
Feature gaps: Plane offers Cycles, Modules and Open Source that Wrike lacks. Wrike brings Custom Workflows, Gantt Charts and Proofing that Plane does not have.
Team fit: Plane is geared toward small teams teams, while Wrike is aimed at enterprise teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Plane is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Wrike is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Plane's biggest strengths are: open source and self-hostable. clean, modern interface inspired by linear. Wrike's biggest strengths are: gantt charts visualize project timelines with task dependencies at a glance. includes resource management as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows.
Watch out for: With Plane, users commonly note that less mature than established alternatives. With Wrike, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Plane if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Cycles and Modules
- You care about clean, modern interface inspired by linear
- Your team size fits the small teams profile Plane is designed for
Choose Wrike if...
- You need a tool built for professional services teams needing resource management
- You specifically need Custom Workflows and Gantt Charts
- You care about includes resource management as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- Your team size fits the enterprise profile Wrike is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for basic use
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.