Plane vs Shortcut
Plane is open-source project management tool for software teams. Self-hostable alternative to Jira and Linear, while Shortcut is project management for software teams with a focus on simplicity and collaboration. The biggest difference up front: Plane is free, while Shortcut starts at $8.50/user/mo. Plane is built for teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management, whereas Shortcut targets mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management | Mid-size software teams that find Jira too heavy and Trello too light |
| Starting price | Free | $8.50/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| API | — | ✓ |
| Cycles | ✓ | — |
| Epics | — | ✓ |
| Iterations | — | ✓ |
| Milestones | — | ✓ |
| Modules | ✓ | — |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Stories | — | ✓ |
| Views | ✓ | — |
Plane
Strengths
- Open source and self-hostable
- Clean, modern interface inspired by Linear
- Free for unlimited users (self-hosted)
- Active development and growing community
Weaknesses
- Less mature than established alternatives
- Fewer integrations
- Self-hosting requires infrastructure management
- Some features still in development
Shortcut
Strengths
- Right balance of features without Jira's complexity
- Clean, intuitive interface
- Good API and integrations
- Generous free tier
Weaknesses
- Smaller market share means less community content
- Fewer advanced reporting features than Jira
- Brand confusion from name change (was Clubhouse)
- Limited customization compared to Jira
The bottom line
Pricing: Plane is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Shortcut starts at $8.50/user/mo, but Free for up to 10 users. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Plane offers Cycles, Modules and Open Source that Shortcut lacks. Shortcut brings API, Epics and Iterations that Plane does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Plane is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Shortcut is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Plane's biggest strengths are: open source and self-hostable. clean, modern interface inspired by linear. Shortcut's biggest strengths are: right balance of features without jira's complexity. clean, intuitive interface.
Watch out for: With Plane, users commonly note that less mature than established alternatives. With Shortcut, the main complaint is that smaller market share means less community content.
Choose Plane if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want open-source, self-hosted project management
- Budget is a hard constraint — Plane is free, Shortcut is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Cycles and Modules
- You care about clean, modern interface inspired by linear
Choose Shortcut if...
- You need a tool built for mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light
- You specifically need API and Epics
- You care about clean, intuitive interface
- The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.