At a glance

Neon Convex
Best for Developers who want serverless Postgres with branching and scale-to-zero Full-stack developers wanting a reactive backend
Starting price $19/mo Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Autoscaling
Branching
File Storage
Real-Time Sync
Scale-to-Zero
Scheduling
Server Functions
Serverless Postgres

Neon

Strengths

  • Scale-to-zero means no cost when database is idle
  • Database branching for development and preview environments
  • Fully compatible Postgres with extensions support
  • Generous free tier for development and small projects

Weaknesses

  • Cold starts when scaling from zero can add latency
  • Relatively young platform compared to managed Postgres competitors
  • Connection pooling needed for serverless frameworks
  • Limited regions compared to larger cloud providers

Convex

Strengths

  • Includes Real-Time Sync as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Includes Server Functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Free for small projects — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes file storage alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in database
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Convex is completely free (Free for small projects), which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Neon starts at $19/mo, but Free tier with 0.5 GB storage and 190 compute hours. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.

Feature gaps: Neon offers Autoscaling, Branching and Scale-to-Zero that Convex lacks. Convex brings File Storage, Real-Time Sync and Scheduling that Neon does not have.

Team fit: Neon is geared toward any size teams, while Convex is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Neon is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Convex is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Neon's biggest strengths are: scale-to-zero means no cost when database is idle. database branching for development and preview environments. Convex's biggest strengths are: includes real-time sync as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows. includes server functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows.

Watch out for: With Neon, users commonly note that cold starts when scaling from zero can add latency. With Convex, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Neon if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want serverless postgres with branching and scale-to-zero
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Autoscaling and Branching
  • You care about database branching for development and preview environments
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Neon is designed for

Choose Convex if...

  • You need a tool built for full-stack developers wanting a reactive backend
  • Budget is a hard constraint — Convex is free, Neon is not
  • You specifically need File Storage and Real-Time Sync
  • You care about includes server functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Convex is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more