At a glance

Mattermost Lark
Best for Teams that need self-hosted, privacy-first messaging Teams wanting an all-in-one collaboration suite
Starting price Free (self-hosted) Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Calendar
Channels
Compliance
Docs
Integrations
Messenger
OKRs
Playbooks
Self-Hosted
Video

Mattermost

Strengths

  • Self-hosted — full control over your data
  • Open source with active community
  • Slack-compatible interface, easy migration
  • Strong compliance and security features

Weaknesses

  • Requires server management if self-hosting
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Slack
  • Cloud-hosted version is more expensive than Slack
  • Mobile apps lag behind Slack and Teams in polish

Lark

Strengths

  • Includes Messenger as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Includes Video as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Free for up to 50 users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes docs alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Feature-rich interface takes time to learn — not the simplest option for quick adoption
  • Notification overload is a real problem as the number of channels grows
  • Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Mattermost and Lark are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Mattermost offers Channels, Compliance and Integrations that Lark lacks. Lark brings Calendar, Docs and Messenger that Mattermost does not have.

Team fit: Mattermost is geared toward mid-size teams teams, while Lark is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Mattermost is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Lark is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Mattermost's biggest strengths are: self-hosted — full control over your data. open source with active community. Lark's biggest strengths are: includes messenger as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows. includes video as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows.

Watch out for: With Mattermost, users commonly note that requires server management if self-hosting. With Lark, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Mattermost if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that need self-hosted, privacy-first messaging
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Channels and Compliance
  • You care about open source with active community
  • Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Mattermost is designed for

Choose Lark if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting an all-in-one collaboration suite
  • You specifically need Calendar and Docs
  • You care about includes video as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Lark is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for up to 50 users

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more