At a glance

Make Power Automate
Best for Power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than Zapier Microsoft 365 teams wanting enterprise automation
Starting price $9/mo $15/user/mo
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
400+ Connectors
AI Builder
Branching Logic
Cloud Flows
Data Mapping
Desktop Flows
Error Handling
Real-Time Webhooks
Visual Builder

Make

Strengths

  • Visual workflow builder is more powerful than Zapier
  • Significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar
  • Complex logic: branching, loops, aggregation
  • Real-time webhooks (not polling)

Weaknesses

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Smaller app library than Zapier
  • Interface can be overwhelming for beginners
  • Documentation not as comprehensive

Power Automate

Strengths

  • Includes Desktop Flows as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Includes Cloud Flows as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Free with M365 limits — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes ai builder alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan has meaningful restrictions: free with m365 limits
  • Enterprise-focused design means the interface can feel heavy for smaller teams
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API
  • Overkill for freelancers or small teams who need something lightweight

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Make's free plan: Free for 1,000 ops/month. Power Automate's free plan: Free with M365 limits. When you outgrow the free tier, Make is the cheaper option at $9/mo vs. $15/user/mo for Power Automate — roughly 66% less.

Feature gaps: Make offers Branching Logic, Data Mapping and Error Handling that Power Automate lacks. Power Automate brings 400+ Connectors, AI Builder and Cloud Flows that Make does not have.

Team fit: Make is geared toward small teams teams, while Power Automate is aimed at enterprise teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Where each tool shines: Make's biggest strengths are: visual workflow builder is more powerful than zapier. significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar. Power Automate's biggest strengths are: includes desktop flows as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows. includes cloud flows as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.

Watch out for: With Make, users commonly note that steeper learning curve than zapier. With Power Automate, the main complaint is that free plan has meaningful restrictions: free with m365 limits.

Choose Make if...

  • You need a tool built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier
  • You want to save on per-user costs — Make is $6.00/user/mo cheaper
  • You specifically need Branching Logic and Data Mapping
  • You care about significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Make is designed for

Choose Power Automate if...

  • You need a tool built for microsoft 365 teams wanting enterprise automation
  • You specifically need 400+ Connectors and AI Builder
  • You care about includes cloud flows as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Your team size fits the enterprise profile Power Automate is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free with m365 limits

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more