Make vs Activepieces
Make is visual automation platform for building complex workflows with a drag-and-drop builder, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. The biggest difference up front: Activepieces is free, while Make starts at $9/mo. Make is built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
At a glance
|
Make
|
Activepieces
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than Zapier | Teams wanting open-source workflow automation |
| Starting price | $9/mo | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| 100+ Integrations | — | ✓ |
| Branching Logic | ✓ | — |
| Code Steps | — | ✓ |
| Data Mapping | ✓ | — |
| Error Handling | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✓ |
Make
Strengths
- Visual workflow builder is more powerful than Zapier
- Significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar
- Complex logic: branching, loops, aggregation
- Real-time webhooks (not polling)
Weaknesses
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Smaller app library than Zapier
- Interface can be overwhelming for beginners
- Documentation not as comprehensive
Activepieces
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Visual Builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
- Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API
The bottom line
Pricing: Activepieces is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Make starts at $9/mo, but Free for 1,000 ops/month. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Make offers Branching Logic, Data Mapping and Error Handling that Activepieces lacks. Activepieces brings 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Self-Hosted that Make does not have. Both share Visual Builder.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Make is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Make's biggest strengths are: visual workflow builder is more powerful than zapier. significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar. Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
Watch out for: With Make, users commonly note that steeper learning curve than zapier. With Activepieces, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Make if...
- You need a tool built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier
- You specifically need Branching Logic and Data Mapping
- You care about significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar
- The free tier works for you: free for 1,000 ops/month
Choose Activepieces if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
- Budget is a hard constraint — Activepieces is free, Make is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
- You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.