Lucidchart vs FigJam
Lucidchart is intelligent diagramming platform for flowcharts, wireframes, and technical diagrams, while FigJam is collaborative whiteboard from Figma for brainstorming, diagramming, and workshops. Lucidchart is built for teams wanting professional diagramming and flowcharts, whereas FigJam targets figma users wanting collaborative brainstorming and diagramming.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams wanting professional diagramming and flowcharts | Figma users wanting collaborative brainstorming and diagramming |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Flowcharts | ✓ | — |
| Integrations | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time Collab | ✓ | — |
| Sticky Notes | — | ✓ |
| Templates | ✓ | — |
| Voting | — | ✓ |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Widgets | — | ✓ |
Lucidchart
Strengths
- Includes Flowcharts as a core feature, purpose-built for diagramming workflows
- Real-time collaboration so multiple designers can work on the same scene together
- Free for 3 documents — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 16+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in diagramming
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
FigJam
Strengths
- Infinite whiteboard canvas for brainstorming and visual thinking
- Sticky notes and drawing tools make remote workshops feel hands-on
- Free for 3 FigJam files — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes voting alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in diagramming
- Relatively new (founded 2021) — the feature set and integrations are still maturing
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Lucidchart's free plan: Free for 3 documents. FigJam's free plan: Free for 3 FigJam files.
Feature gaps: Lucidchart offers Flowcharts, Integrations and Real-Time Collab that FigJam lacks. FigJam brings Sticky Notes, Voting and Whiteboard that Lucidchart does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target any size teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Where each tool shines: Lucidchart's biggest strengths are: includes flowcharts as a core feature, purpose-built for diagramming workflows. real-time collaboration so multiple designers can work on the same scene together. FigJam's biggest strengths are: infinite whiteboard canvas for brainstorming and visual thinking. sticky notes and drawing tools make remote workshops feel hands-on.
Watch out for: With Lucidchart, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With FigJam, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Lucidchart if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting professional diagramming and flowcharts
- You specifically need Flowcharts and Integrations
- You care about real-time collaboration so multiple designers can work on the same scene together
- The free tier works for you: free for 3 documents
Choose FigJam if...
- You need a tool built for figma users wanting collaborative brainstorming and diagramming
- You specifically need Sticky Notes and Voting
- You care about sticky notes and drawing tools make remote workshops feel hands-on
- The free tier works for you: free for 3 figjam files
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.