At a glance

June Matomo
Best for B2B SaaS teams wanting product analytics built for them Organizations wanting full Google Analytics replacement with privacy
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Activation
Company Analytics
Feature Reports
GDPR
Heatmaps
Open Source
Retention
Self-Hosted

June

Strengths

  • Includes Company Analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Includes Feature Reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Free for 1K monthly users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes activation alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

Matomo

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results

The bottom line

Pricing: Both June and Matomo are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: June offers Activation, Company Analytics and Feature Reports that Matomo lacks. Matomo brings GDPR, Heatmaps and Open Source that June does not have.

Team fit: June is geared toward small teams teams, while Matomo is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Matomo is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. June is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: June's biggest strengths are: includes company analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. Matomo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development.

Watch out for: With June, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Matomo, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose June if...

  • You need a tool built for b2b saas teams wanting product analytics built for them
  • You specifically need Activation and Company Analytics
  • You care about includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile June is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 1k monthly users

Choose Matomo if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need GDPR and Heatmaps
  • You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Matomo is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more