Joplin vs Capacities
Joplin is open-source note-taking with end-to-end encryption, Markdown support, and sync via any cloud, while Capacities is note-taking app built around objects and types instead of pages and folders. Joplin is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Joplin is built for privacy-focused users wanting open-source note-taking, whereas Capacities targets users wanting object-based note-taking with structure.
At a glance
|
Joplin
|
Capacities
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Privacy-focused users wanting open-source note-taking | Users wanting object-based note-taking with structure |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — |
| Daily Notes | — | ✓ |
| E2E Encryption | ✓ | — |
| Markdown | ✓ | — |
| Object-Based | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Relations | — | ✓ |
| Tags | — | ✓ |
| Webclipper | ✓ | — |
Joplin
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Moving notes out to another platform can be difficult — export options vary
Capacities
Strengths
- Object-based canvas treats every element as a manipulable node for precise control
- Includes Daily Notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows
- Free for personal use — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes relations alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Moving notes out to another platform can be difficult — export options vary
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Joplin and Capacities are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.
Feature gaps: Joplin offers E2E Encryption, Markdown and Open Source that Capacities lacks. Capacities brings Daily Notes, Object-Based and Relations that Joplin does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target individuals teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Joplin is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Capacities is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Joplin's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development. Capacities's biggest strengths are: object-based canvas treats every element as a manipulable node for precise control. includes daily notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows.
Watch out for: With Joplin, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Capacities, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Joplin if...
- You need a tool built for privacy-focused users wanting open-source note-taking
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need E2E Encryption and Markdown
- You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
Choose Capacities if...
- You need a tool built for users wanting object-based note-taking with structure
- You specifically need Daily Notes and Object-Based
- You care about includes daily notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for personal use
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.