Jira vs Asana
Jira is enterprise project management and issue tracking for software development teams, while Asana is work management platform for teams to organize, track, and manage projects. Jira comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Jira is built for large engineering teams that need customizable workflows and reporting, whereas Asana targets cross-functional teams that need multiple project views.
At a glance
|
Jira
|
Asana
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Large engineering teams that need customizable workflows and reporting | Cross-functional teams that need multiple project views |
| Starting price | $7.75/user/mo | $10.99/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Automations | — | ✓ |
| Custom Workflows | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | — |
| Forms | — | ✓ |
| Goals | — | ✓ |
| Marketplace | ✓ | — |
| Portfolios | — | ✓ |
| Roadmaps | ✓ | — |
| Sprints | ✓ | — |
| Timeline View | — | ✓ |
Jira
Strengths
- Extremely customizable workflows and fields
- Advanced reporting and dashboards
- Massive marketplace of add-ons
- Handles complex enterprise requirements
Weaknesses
- Slow and bloated interface
- Overwhelming complexity for small teams
- Configuration often requires a dedicated admin
- Simple tasks take too many clicks
Asana
Strengths
- Multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar
- Intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- Good for cross-functional collaboration
- Strong automation and rules engine
Weaknesses
- Expensive compared to alternatives
- Free tier is quite limited
- Can be too generic for software development
- Performance slows with large projects
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Jira's free plan: Free for up to 10 users. Asana's free plan: Free for up to 10 users, limited views. When you outgrow the free tier, Jira is the cheaper option at $7.75/user/mo vs. $10.99/user/mo for Asana — roughly 41% less.
Feature gaps: Jira offers Custom Workflows, Dashboards and Marketplace that Asana lacks. Asana brings Automations, Forms and Goals that Jira does not have.
Team fit: Jira is geared toward enterprise teams, while Asana is aimed at mid-size teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Where each tool shines: Jira's biggest strengths are: extremely customizable workflows and fields. advanced reporting and dashboards. Asana's biggest strengths are: multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar. intuitive interface that non-technical users love.
Watch out for: With Jira, users commonly note that slow and bloated interface. With Asana, the main complaint is that expensive compared to alternatives.
Choose Jira if...
- You need a tool built for large engineering teams that need customizable workflows and reporting
- You want to save on per-user costs — Jira is $3.24/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Custom Workflows and Dashboards
- You care about advanced reporting and dashboards
- Your team size fits the enterprise profile Jira is designed for
Choose Asana if...
- You need a tool built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views
- You specifically need Automations and Forms
- You care about intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Asana is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users, limited views
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.