Hugo vs Eleventy
Hugo is blazing fast static site generator written in Go with flexible templating, while Eleventy is simple static site generator with flexible templating and zero client-side JavaScript. Hugo is built for developers wanting the fastest static site generator, whereas Eleventy targets developers wanting a simple, zero-config static site generator.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Developers wanting the fastest static site generator | Developers wanting a simple, zero-config static site generator |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data Cascade | — | ✓ |
| Fast Builds | ✓ | — |
| Go-Powered | ✓ | — |
| Multilingual | ✓ | — |
| Multiple Templates | — | ✓ |
| Plugins | — | ✓ |
| Themes | ✓ | — |
| Zero Config | — | ✓ |
Hugo
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Go-Powered as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Performance and SEO control is limited compared to custom-coded sites
Eleventy
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Zero Config as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Performance and SEO control is limited compared to custom-coded sites
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Hugo and Eleventy are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Hugo offers Fast Builds, Go-Powered and Multilingual that Eleventy lacks. Eleventy brings Data Cascade, Multiple Templates and Plugins that Hugo does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target individuals teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Both Hugo and Eleventy are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Hugo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes go-powered as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows. Eleventy's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes zero config as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows.
Watch out for: With Hugo, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Eleventy, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Hugo if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting the fastest static site generator
- You specifically need Fast Builds and Go-Powered
- You care about includes go-powered as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
Choose Eleventy if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting a simple, zero-config static site generator
- You specifically need Data Cascade and Multiple Templates
- You care about includes zero config as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.