At a glance

Hotjar Matomo
Best for Teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings Organizations wanting full Google Analytics replacement with privacy
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Funnels
GDPR
Heatmaps
Open Source
Self-Hosted
Session Recordings
Surveys

Hotjar

Strengths

  • Includes Heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Includes Session Recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Free for 35 sessions/day — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 12+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

Matomo

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Hotjar and Matomo are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Hotjar offers Funnels, Session Recordings and Surveys that Matomo lacks. Matomo brings GDPR, Open Source and Self-Hosted that Hotjar does not have. Both share Heatmaps.

Team fit: Hotjar is geared toward small teams teams, while Matomo is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Matomo is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Hotjar is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Hotjar's biggest strengths are: includes heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. Matomo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development.

Watch out for: With Hotjar, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Matomo, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose Hotjar if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings
  • You specifically need Funnels and Session Recordings
  • You care about includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Hotjar is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 35 sessions/day

Choose Matomo if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need GDPR and Open Source
  • You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Matomo is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more