Hotjar vs June
Hotjar is behavior analytics tool with heatmaps, session recordings, and user feedback surveys, while June is product analytics specifically designed for B2B SaaS with company-level insights. Hotjar is built for teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings, whereas June targets b2b saas teams wanting product analytics built for them.
At a glance
|
Hotjar
|
June
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings | B2B SaaS teams wanting product analytics built for them |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Activation | — | ✓ |
| Company Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Feature Reports | — | ✓ |
| Funnels | ✓ | — |
| Heatmaps | ✓ | — |
| Retention | — | ✓ |
| Session Recordings | ✓ | — |
| Surveys | ✓ | — |
Hotjar
Strengths
- Includes Heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Includes Session Recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Free for 35 sessions/day — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 12+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
June
Strengths
- Includes Company Analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Includes Feature Reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Free for 1K monthly users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes activation alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Data accuracy depends on tracking setup — misconfigured events give misleading results
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Hotjar's free plan: Free for 35 sessions/day. June's free plan: Free for 1K monthly users.
Feature gaps: Hotjar offers Funnels, Heatmaps and Session Recordings that June lacks. June brings Activation, Company Analytics and Feature Reports that Hotjar does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Where each tool shines: Hotjar's biggest strengths are: includes heatmaps as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. June's biggest strengths are: includes company analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows. includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows.
Watch out for: With Hotjar, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With June, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Hotjar if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting heatmaps and session recordings
- You specifically need Funnels and Heatmaps
- You care about includes session recordings as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 35 sessions/day
Choose June if...
- You need a tool built for b2b saas teams wanting product analytics built for them
- You specifically need Activation and Company Analytics
- You care about includes feature reports as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 1k monthly users
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.