At a glance

Hasura Convex
Best for Developers wanting instant GraphQL APIs on their database Full-stack developers wanting a reactive backend
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Auth
File Storage
GraphQL
Real-Time
Real-Time Sync
Remote Schemas
Scheduling
Server Functions

Hasura

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Includes GraphQL as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • Free for 1 project — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in database
  • Community support can be slower than the dedicated support teams at commercial alternatives

Convex

Strengths

  • Includes Real-Time Sync as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Includes Server Functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • Free for small projects — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes file storage alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in database
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Hasura's free plan: Free for 1 project. Convex's free plan: Free for small projects.

Feature gaps: Hasura offers Auth, GraphQL and Real-Time that Convex lacks. Convex brings File Storage, Real-Time Sync and Scheduling that Hasura does not have.

Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.

Open source: Hasura is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Convex is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Hasura's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows. Convex's biggest strengths are: includes real-time sync as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows. includes server functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows.

Watch out for: With Hasura, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Convex, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Hasura if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Auth and GraphQL
  • You care about includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • The free tier works for you: free for 1 project

Choose Convex if...

  • You need a tool built for full-stack developers wanting a reactive backend
  • You specifically need File Storage and Real-Time Sync
  • You care about includes server functions as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • The free tier works for you: free for small projects

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more