Google Meet vs Jitsi
Google Meet is video conferencing built into Google Workspace with screen sharing, recording, and live captions, while Jitsi is free, open-source video meeting solution with no account required and self-hosting option. Jitsi is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Google Meet is built for google workspace users who need simple video calls, whereas Jitsi targets anyone wanting free, open-source video conferencing.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Google Workspace users who need simple video calls | Anyone wanting free, open-source video conferencing |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Captions | ✓ | — |
| E2E Encryption | — | ✓ |
| No Account Needed | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | — | ✓ |
| Recording | ✓ | — |
| Screen Sharing | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
| Workspace Integration | ✓ | — |
Google Meet
Strengths
- Screen sharing built into every call with no plugins or extensions needed
- Includes Captions as a core feature, purpose-built for video conferencing workflows
- Free for 60-min group calls — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Includes recording alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Call quality depends heavily on participants' internet connections
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
Jitsi
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
- Call quality depends heavily on participants' internet connections
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Google Meet and Jitsi are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.
Feature gaps: Google Meet offers Captions, Recording and Screen Sharing that Jitsi lacks. Jitsi brings E2E Encryption, No Account Needed and Open Source that Google Meet does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target any size teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Jitsi is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Google Meet is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Google Meet's biggest strengths are: screen sharing built into every call with no plugins or extensions needed. includes captions as a core feature, purpose-built for video conferencing workflows. Jitsi's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development.
Watch out for: With Google Meet, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Jitsi, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Google Meet if...
- You need a tool built for google workspace users who need simple video calls
- You specifically need Captions and Recording
- You care about includes captions as a core feature, purpose-built for video conferencing workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 60-min group calls
Choose Jitsi if...
- You need a tool built for anyone wanting free, open-source video conferencing
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need E2E Encryption and No Account Needed
- You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.