Figma vs Penpot
Figma is browser-based collaborative design tool for UI/UX design, prototyping, and design systems, while Penpot is open-source, browser-based design and prototyping platform. Self-hostable. The biggest difference up front: Penpot is free, while Figma starts at $12/editor/mo. Figma is built for design teams that need real-time collaboration, whereas Penpot targets teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Design teams that need real-time collaboration | Teams that want a free, open-source Figma alternative |
| Starting price | $12/editor/mo | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Auto Layout | ✓ | — |
| Components | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dev Mode | ✓ | — |
| Open Source | — | ✓ |
| Prototyping | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-Time Collab | ✓ | — |
| SVG Native | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
Figma
Strengths
- Real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file
- Browser-based, works on any OS
- Excellent component and design system support
- Strong developer handoff features
Weaknesses
- Per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams
- Browser-based means no offline support
- Performance can lag with very large files
- Limited vector editing compared to Illustrator
Penpot
Strengths
- 100% free and open source
- Self-hostable for data sovereignty
- Real-time collaboration like Figma
- Uses open standards (SVG)
Weaknesses
- Less mature than Figma — fewer features
- Smaller plugin and community ecosystem
- Performance not as smooth as Figma
- Fewer design resources and templates available
The bottom line
Pricing: Penpot is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Figma starts at $12/editor/mo, but 3 projects, 3 pages per project. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Figma offers Auto Layout, Dev Mode and Real-Time Collab that Penpot lacks. Penpot brings Open Source, SVG Native and Self-Hosted that Figma does not have. Both share Components and Prototyping.
Team fit: Figma is geared toward any size teams, while Penpot is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Penpot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Figma is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Figma's biggest strengths are: real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file. browser-based, works on any os. Penpot's biggest strengths are: 100% free and open source. self-hostable for data sovereignty.
Watch out for: With Figma, users commonly note that per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams. With Penpot, the main complaint is that less mature than figma — fewer features.
Choose Figma if...
- You need a tool built for design teams that need real-time collaboration
- You specifically need Auto Layout and Dev Mode
- You care about browser-based, works on any os
- Your team size fits the any size profile Figma is designed for
- The free tier works for you: 3 projects, 3 pages per project
Choose Penpot if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams that want a free, open-source figma alternative
- Budget is a hard constraint — Penpot is free, Figma is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Open Source and SVG Native
- You care about self-hostable for data sovereignty
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.