Figma vs InVision
Figma is browser-based collaborative design tool for UI/UX design, prototyping, and design systems, while InVision is digital product design platform for prototyping, collaboration, and design system management. InVision comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Figma is built for design teams that need real-time collaboration, whereas InVision targets teams needing design feedback workflows.
At a glance
|
Figma
|
InVision
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Design teams that need real-time collaboration | Teams needing design feedback workflows |
| Starting price | $12/editor/mo | $7.95/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Auto Layout | ✓ | — |
| Components | ✓ | — |
| Design Systems | — | ✓ |
| Dev Mode | ✓ | — |
| Freehand | — | ✓ |
| Inspect | — | ✓ |
| Prototyping | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-Time Collab | ✓ | — |
Figma
Strengths
- Real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file
- Browser-based, works on any OS
- Excellent component and design system support
- Strong developer handoff features
Weaknesses
- Per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams
- Browser-based means no offline support
- Performance can lag with very large files
- Limited vector editing compared to Illustrator
InVision
Strengths
- Interactive prototyping with transitions so stakeholders can click through realistic mockups
- Includes Design Systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
- Free for 1 prototype — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 15+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Figma's free plan: 3 projects, 3 pages per project. InVision's free plan: Free for 1 prototype. When you outgrow the free tier, InVision is the cheaper option at $7.95/mo vs. $12/editor/mo for Figma — roughly 50% less.
Feature gaps: Figma offers Auto Layout, Components and Dev Mode that InVision lacks. InVision brings Design Systems, Freehand and Inspect that Figma does not have. Both share Prototyping.
Team fit: Figma is geared toward any size teams, while InVision is aimed at mid-size teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Where each tool shines: Figma's biggest strengths are: real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file. browser-based, works on any os. InVision's biggest strengths are: interactive prototyping with transitions so stakeholders can click through realistic mockups. includes design systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows.
Watch out for: With Figma, users commonly note that per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams. With InVision, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Figma if...
- You need a tool built for design teams that need real-time collaboration
- You specifically need Auto Layout and Components
- You care about browser-based, works on any os
- Your team size fits the any size profile Figma is designed for
- The free tier works for you: 3 projects, 3 pages per project
Choose InVision if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams needing design feedback workflows
- You want to save on per-user costs — InVision is $4.05/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Design Systems and Freehand
- You care about includes design systems as a core feature, purpose-built for design workflows
- Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile InVision is designed for
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.