Figma vs Excalidraw
Figma is browser-based collaborative design tool for UI/UX design, prototyping, and design systems, while Excalidraw is virtual whiteboard with a hand-drawn aesthetic for diagrams, sketches, and brainstorming. The biggest difference up front: Excalidraw is free, while Figma starts at $12/editor/mo. Figma is built for design teams that need real-time collaboration, whereas Excalidraw targets anyone wanting quick hand-drawn diagrams.
At a glance
|
Figma
|
Excalidraw
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Design teams that need real-time collaboration | Anyone wanting quick hand-drawn diagrams |
| Starting price | $12/editor/mo | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Auto Layout | ✓ | — |
| Components | ✓ | — |
| Dev Mode | ✓ | — |
| Embeddable | — | ✓ |
| Hand-Drawn Style | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | — | ✓ |
| Prototyping | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time Collab | ✓ | ✓ |
Figma
Strengths
- Real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file
- Browser-based, works on any OS
- Excellent component and design system support
- Strong developer handoff features
Weaknesses
- Per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams
- Browser-based means no offline support
- Performance can lag with very large files
- Limited vector editing compared to Illustrator
Excalidraw
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Hand-drawn aesthetic makes diagrams feel informal and approachable — great for early ideas
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Output quality depends on your design skills — templates only go so far
The bottom line
Pricing: Excalidraw is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Figma starts at $12/editor/mo, but 3 projects, 3 pages per project. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Figma offers Auto Layout, Components and Dev Mode that Excalidraw lacks. Excalidraw brings Embeddable, Hand-Drawn Style and Open Source that Figma does not have. Both share Real-Time Collab.
Team fit: Both tools target any size teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Excalidraw is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Figma is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Figma's biggest strengths are: real-time collaboration — multiple designers, one file. browser-based, works on any os. Excalidraw's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. hand-drawn aesthetic makes diagrams feel informal and approachable — great for early ideas.
Watch out for: With Figma, users commonly note that per-editor pricing gets expensive for large teams. With Excalidraw, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Figma if...
- You need a tool built for design teams that need real-time collaboration
- You specifically need Auto Layout and Components
- You care about browser-based, works on any os
- The free tier works for you: 3 projects, 3 pages per project
Choose Excalidraw if...
- You need a tool built for anyone wanting quick hand-drawn diagrams
- Budget is a hard constraint — Excalidraw is free, Figma is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Embeddable and Hand-Drawn Style
- You care about hand-drawn aesthetic makes diagrams feel informal and approachable — great for early ideas
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.