Fathom vs PostHog
Fathom is simple, privacy-focused website analytics. GDPR, CCPA, and PECR compliant, while PostHog is open-source product analytics suite with session replay, feature flags, A/B testing, and surveys. The biggest difference up front: PostHog is free, while Fathom starts at $14/mo. Fathom is built for businesses that want simple analytics without privacy headaches, whereas PostHog targets product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Businesses that want simple analytics without privacy headaches | Product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool |
| Starting price | $14/mo | Free |
| Free tier | — | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | — | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| A/B Testing | — | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| EU Isolation | ✓ | — |
| Event Tracking | ✓ | — |
| Feature Flags | — | ✓ |
| Privacy First | ✓ | — |
| Product Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Session Replay | — | ✓ |
| Surveys | — | ✓ |
| Uptime Monitoring | ✓ | — |
Fathom
Strengths
- Privacy-compliant out of the box
- Simple, one-page dashboard
- EU isolation option for data residency
- Reliable uptime and fast loading
Weaknesses
- More expensive than Plausible
- Not open source
- Limited advanced analytics
- No self-hosting option
PostHog
Strengths
- All-in-one: analytics, session replay, feature flags, A/B tests
- Generous free tier (1M events/mo)
- Open source and self-hostable
- Strong developer experience
Weaknesses
- Can be overwhelming — lots of features
- Self-hosting requires significant infrastructure
- UI has a learning curve
- Some features less mature than best-in-class alternatives
The bottom line
Pricing: PostHog is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Fathom starts at $14/mo. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Fathom offers Cookieless, EU Isolation and Event Tracking that PostHog lacks. PostHog brings A/B Testing, Feature Flags and Product Analytics that Fathom does not have.
Team fit: Fathom is geared toward individual users and small setups, while PostHog is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: PostHog is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Fathom is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Fathom's biggest strengths are: privacy-compliant out of the box. simple, one-page dashboard. PostHog's biggest strengths are: all-in-one: analytics, session replay, feature flags, a/b tests. generous free tier (1m events/mo).
Watch out for: With Fathom, users commonly note that more expensive than plausible. With PostHog, the main complaint is that can be overwhelming — lots of features.
Choose Fathom if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: businesses that want simple analytics without privacy headaches
- You specifically need Cookieless and EU Isolation
- You care about simple, one-page dashboard
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Fathom is designed for
Choose PostHog if...
- You need a tool built for product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool
- Budget is a hard constraint — PostHog is free, Fathom is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need A/B Testing and Feature Flags
- You care about generous free tier (1m events/mo)
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.