Crisp vs Chatwoot
Crisp is all-in-one business messaging platform with live chat, chatbot, help desk, and CRM, while Chatwoot is open-source customer engagement platform with live chat, email, social channels, and chatbots. Chatwoot is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Crisp is built for startups and small businesses that want affordable live chat + help desk, whereas Chatwoot targets teams wanting open-source customer engagement.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Startups and small businesses that want affordable live chat + help desk | Teams wanting open-source customer engagement |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| CRM | ✓ | — |
| Chatbot | ✓ | — |
| Chatbots | — | ✓ |
| Help Desk | ✓ | — |
| Live Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| Omnichannel | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
| Shared Inbox | ✓ | — |
Crisp
Strengths
- Generous free tier for basic live chat
- Much cheaper than Intercom
- All-in-one: chat, bot, help desk, CRM
- Clean, modern interface
Weaknesses
- Less powerful AI than Intercom's Fin
- Fewer integrations
- Reporting less detailed than enterprise tools
- Some features less polished
Chatwoot
Strengths
- Open source and transparent
- Includes Live Chat as a core feature, purpose-built for customer support workflows
- Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
- The core product is free with no paywalled essentials
Weaknesses
- May lack some advanced features
- Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
- Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
- Ticket volume can quickly overwhelm small teams without triage automation
The bottom line
Pricing: Both Crisp and Chatwoot are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Crisp offers CRM, Chatbot and Help Desk that Chatwoot lacks. Chatwoot brings Chatbots, Omnichannel and Self-Hosted that Crisp does not have. Both share Live Chat.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Chatwoot is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Crisp is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Crisp's biggest strengths are: generous free tier for basic live chat. much cheaper than intercom. Chatwoot's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes live chat as a core feature, purpose-built for customer support workflows.
Watch out for: With Crisp, users commonly note that less powerful ai than intercom's fin. With Chatwoot, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
Choose Crisp if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: startups and small businesses that want affordable live chat + help desk
- You specifically need CRM and Chatbot
- You care about much cheaper than intercom
Choose Chatwoot if...
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source customer engagement
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need Chatbots and Omnichannel
- You care about includes live chat as a core feature, purpose-built for customer support workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.