Close vs Copper
Close is CRM built for inside sales with built-in calling, email sequences, and pipeline management, while Copper is CRM built for Google Workspace with automatic contact and activity capture from Gmail. Copper comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Close is built for inside sales teams wanting built-in calling and email, whereas Copper targets google workspace users wanting a crm that lives in gmail.
At a glance
|
|
Copper | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Inside sales teams wanting built-in calling and email | Google Workspace users wanting a CRM that lives in Gmail |
| Starting price | $49/user/mo | $23/user/mo |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Auto-Capture | — | ✓ |
| Built-in Calling | ✓ | — |
| Email Sequences | ✓ | — |
| Gmail Integration | — | ✓ |
| Pipeline | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Dialer | ✓ | — |
| Reporting | — | ✓ |
Close
Strengths
- Includes Built-in Calling as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
- Includes Email Sequences as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
- Pricing starts at $49/user/mo, which includes the full crm feature set
- Established product with 13+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Starts at $49/user/mo — on the expensive side, especially for small teams or solo users
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Data entry overhead can slow down reps who just want to sell
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
Copper
Strengths
- Includes Gmail Integration as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
- Includes Auto-Capture as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
- Pricing starts at $23/user/mo, which includes the full crm feature set
- Established product with 13+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Starts at $23/user/mo — on the expensive side, especially for small teams or solo users
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Data entry overhead can slow down reps who just want to sell
- Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up
The bottom line
Pricing: Close starts at $49/user/mo. Copper starts at $23/user/mo. Copper is the more affordable option.
Feature gaps: Close offers Built-in Calling, Email Sequences and Power Dialer that Copper lacks. Copper brings Auto-Capture, Gmail Integration and Reporting that Close does not have. Both share Pipeline.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Where each tool shines: Close's biggest strengths are: includes built-in calling as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows. includes email sequences as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows. Copper's biggest strengths are: includes gmail integration as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows. includes auto-capture as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows.
Watch out for: With Close, users commonly note that starts at $49/user/mo — on the expensive side, especially for small teams or solo users. With Copper, the main complaint is that starts at $23/user/mo — on the expensive side, especially for small teams or solo users.
Choose Close if...
- You need a tool built for inside sales teams wanting built-in calling and email
- You specifically need Built-in Calling and Email Sequences
- You care about includes email sequences as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
Choose Copper if...
- You need a tool built for google workspace users wanting a crm that lives in gmail
- You want to save on per-user costs — Copper is $26.00/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Auto-Capture and Gmail Integration
- You care about includes auto-capture as a core feature, purpose-built for crm workflows
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.