At a glance

Chanty Zulip
Best for Small teams wanting simple, affordable team chat Open-source communities and teams wanting threaded messaging
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Markdown
Open Source
Self-Hosted
Tasks
Threads
Topic Threading
Unlimited History
Video Calls

Chanty

Strengths

  • Unlimited message history on every plan — nothing gets lost or archived
  • Includes Tasks as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Free for up to 5 members — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes video calls alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Notification overload is a real problem as the number of channels grows
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

Zulip

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Topic-based threading keeps conversations organized by subject, not just time
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Notification overload is a real problem as the number of channels grows

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Chanty and Zulip are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Chanty offers Tasks, Threads and Unlimited History that Zulip lacks. Zulip brings Markdown, Open Source and Self-Hosted that Chanty does not have.

Team fit: Chanty is geared toward small teams teams, while Zulip is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Zulip is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Chanty is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Chanty's biggest strengths are: unlimited message history on every plan — nothing gets lost or archived. includes tasks as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows. Zulip's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. topic-based threading keeps conversations organized by subject, not just time.

Watch out for: With Chanty, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Zulip, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose Chanty if...

  • You need a tool built for small teams wanting simple, affordable team chat
  • You specifically need Tasks and Threads
  • You care about includes tasks as a core feature, purpose-built for team communication workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Chanty is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for up to 5 members

Choose Zulip if...

  • You need a tool built for open-source communities and teams wanting threaded messaging
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Markdown and Open Source
  • You care about topic-based threading keeps conversations organized by subject, not just time
  • Your team size fits the any size profile Zulip is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more