At a glance

Carrd Astro
Best for Anyone needing a simple one-page site fast Developers wanting content-focused static sites
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Content Collections
Custom Domains
Forms
Island Architecture
One-Page Sites
Responsive
SSG/SSR
Zero JS

Carrd

Strengths

  • Includes One-Page Sites as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
  • Built-in forms let you collect requests and turn submissions into tasks automatically
  • 3 free sites — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes responsive alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Performance and SEO control is limited compared to custom-coded sites
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

Astro

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Includes Island Architecture as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Performance and SEO control is limited compared to custom-coded sites

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Carrd and Astro are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Carrd offers Custom Domains, Forms and One-Page Sites that Astro lacks. Astro brings Content Collections, Island Architecture and SSG/SSR that Carrd does not have.

Team fit: Carrd is geared toward individual users and small setups, while Astro is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Astro is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Carrd is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Carrd's biggest strengths are: includes one-page sites as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows. built-in forms let you collect requests and turn submissions into tasks automatically. Astro's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes island architecture as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows.

Watch out for: With Carrd, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Astro, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose Carrd if...

  • You need a tool built for anyone needing a simple one-page site fast
  • You specifically need Custom Domains and Forms
  • You care about built-in forms let you collect requests and turn submissions into tasks automatically
  • Your team size fits the individuals profile Carrd is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: 3 free sites

Choose Astro if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting content-focused static sites
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Content Collections and Island Architecture
  • You care about includes island architecture as a core feature, purpose-built for website builder workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Astro is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more