At a glance

Capacities Standard Notes
Best for Users wanting object-based note-taking with structure Privacy-focused users wanting encrypted notes
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Daily Notes
E2E Encryption
Editors
Object-Based
Relations
Self-Hosted
Tags

Capacities

Strengths

  • Object-based canvas treats every element as a manipulable node for precise control
  • Includes Daily Notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows
  • Free for personal use — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes relations alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Moving notes out to another platform can be difficult — export options vary
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

Standard Notes

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • End-to-end encryption by default — messages are unreadable even to the server operator
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • Free with basic editors — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Moving notes out to another platform can be difficult — export options vary
  • Community support can be slower than the dedicated support teams at commercial alternatives

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Capacities's free plan: Free for personal use. Standard Notes's free plan: Free with basic editors.

Feature gaps: Capacities offers Daily Notes, Object-Based and Relations that Standard Notes lacks. Standard Notes brings E2E Encryption, Editors and Self-Hosted that Capacities does not have. Both share Tags.

Team fit: Both tools target individuals teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.

Open source: Standard Notes is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Capacities is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Capacities's biggest strengths are: object-based canvas treats every element as a manipulable node for precise control. includes daily notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows. Standard Notes's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. end-to-end encryption by default — messages are unreadable even to the server operator.

Watch out for: With Capacities, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Standard Notes, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Capacities if...

  • You need a tool built for users wanting object-based note-taking with structure
  • You specifically need Daily Notes and Object-Based
  • You care about includes daily notes as a core feature, purpose-built for note taking workflows
  • The free tier works for you: free for personal use

Choose Standard Notes if...

  • You need a tool built for privacy-focused users wanting encrypted notes
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need E2E Encryption and Editors
  • You care about end-to-end encryption by default — messages are unreadable even to the server operator
  • The free tier works for you: free with basic editors

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more