At a glance

Bitbucket Gitea
Best for Atlassian users who want integrated Git hosting Teams wanting lightweight self-hosted Git
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
Actions CI
Git Hosting
Jira Integration
Lightweight
Package Registry
Pipelines CI/CD
Pull Requests
Self-Hosted

Bitbucket

Strengths

  • Includes Git Hosting as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
  • Includes Pipelines CI/CD as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
  • Free for up to 5 users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Established product with 18+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Large binary files (videos, PSDs) are still a pain to manage in Git-based systems
  • Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish

Gitea

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Large binary files (videos, PSDs) are still a pain to manage in Git-based systems

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Bitbucket and Gitea are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Bitbucket offers Git Hosting, Jira Integration and Pipelines CI/CD that Gitea lacks. Gitea brings Actions CI, Lightweight and Package Registry that Bitbucket does not have.

Team fit: Bitbucket is geared toward mid-size teams teams, while Gitea is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Gitea is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Bitbucket is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Bitbucket's biggest strengths are: includes git hosting as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows. includes pipelines ci/cd as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows. Gitea's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure.

Watch out for: With Bitbucket, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Gitea, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.

Choose Bitbucket if...

  • You need a tool built for atlassian users who want integrated git hosting
  • You specifically need Git Hosting and Jira Integration
  • You care about includes pipelines ci/cd as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
  • Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Bitbucket is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for up to 5 users

Choose Gitea if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Actions CI and Lightweight
  • You care about self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Gitea is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more