What is the difference between Ashby and Lever?

Ashby is best for Growth-stage companies wanting an all-in-one recruiting platform, while Lever is best for Talent teams wanting a combined ATS + CRM. Ashby starts at Custom pricing and Lever starts at Custom.

Is Ashby or Lever cheaper?

Ashby starts at Custom pricing. Lever starts at Custom.

Ashby vs Lever (2026) — notanothertool

At a glance

	Ashby	Lever
Best for	Growth-stage companies wanting an all-in-one recruiting platform	Talent teams wanting a combined ATS + CRM
Starting price	Custom pricing	Custom
Free tier	—	—
Open source	—	—

Ashby

Strengths

ATS + CRM + scheduling + analytics in one tool
Beautiful, modern interface
Strong analytics and reporting
Customizable hiring workflows

Weaknesses

Enterprise pricing — not cheap
Less suitable for early-stage startups
Fewer integrations than Greenhouse
Newer platform with smaller market share

Try Ashby → Full review

Lever

Strengths

Includes ATS + CRM as a core feature, purpose-built for hr & recruiting workflows
Includes Nurture Campaigns as a core feature, purpose-built for hr & recruiting workflows
Focused toolset keeps the interface clean and easy to navigate
Established product with 14+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem

Weaknesses

No free tier, so you can't try it without committing to a paid plan
Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
Ecosystem of third-party integrations is smaller than the market leaders in hr & recruiting
Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish

Try Lever → Full review

The bottom line

Ashby and Lever serve similar needs but take different approaches. Growth-stage companies wanting an all-in-one recruiting platform while Lever is talent teams wanting a combined ats + crm.