Asana vs Teamwork
Asana is work management platform for teams to organize, track, and manage projects, while Teamwork is project management with time tracking, resource management, and client-facing features. Teamwork comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Asana is built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views, whereas Teamwork targets client-facing teams needing project + time tracking.
At a glance
|
Asana
|
Teamwork
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Cross-functional teams that need multiple project views | Client-facing teams needing project + time tracking |
| Starting price | $10.99/user/mo | $5.99/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Automations | ✓ | — |
| Budgets | — | ✓ |
| Client Access | — | ✓ |
| Forms | ✓ | — |
| Goals | ✓ | — |
| Portfolios | ✓ | — |
| Templates | — | ✓ |
| Time Tracking | — | ✓ |
| Timeline View | ✓ | — |
Asana
Strengths
- Multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar
- Intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- Good for cross-functional collaboration
- Strong automation and rules engine
Weaknesses
- Expensive compared to alternatives
- Free tier is quite limited
- Can be too generic for software development
- Performance slows with large projects
Teamwork
Strengths
- Native time tracking eliminates the need for a separate time-logging tool
- Includes Budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- Free for 5 users — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
- Established product with 19+ years on the market and a mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
- Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
- Migrating existing projects from another tool can be time-consuming
- Mobile experience lags behind the desktop version in features and polish
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Asana's free plan: Free for up to 10 users, limited views. Teamwork's free plan: Free for 5 users. When you outgrow the free tier, Teamwork is the cheaper option at $5.99/user/mo vs. $10.99/user/mo for Asana — roughly 83% less.
Feature gaps: Asana offers Automations, Forms and Goals that Teamwork lacks. Teamwork brings Budgets, Client Access and Templates that Asana does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target mid-size teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Where each tool shines: Asana's biggest strengths are: multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar. intuitive interface that non-technical users love. Teamwork's biggest strengths are: native time tracking eliminates the need for a separate time-logging tool. includes budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows.
Watch out for: With Asana, users commonly note that expensive compared to alternatives. With Teamwork, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.
Choose Asana if...
- You need a tool built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views
- You specifically need Automations and Forms
- You care about intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users, limited views
Choose Teamwork if...
- You need a tool built for client-facing teams needing project + time tracking
- You want to save on per-user costs — Teamwork is $5.00/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need Budgets and Client Access
- You care about includes budgets as a core feature, purpose-built for project management workflows
- The free tier works for you: free for 5 users
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.