At a glance

Asana Shortcut
Best for Cross-functional teams that need multiple project views Mid-size software teams that find Jira too heavy and Trello too light
Starting price $10.99/user/mo $8.50/user/mo
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
API
Automations
Epics
Forms
Goals
Iterations
Milestones
Portfolios
Stories
Timeline View

Asana

Strengths

  • Multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar
  • Intuitive interface that non-technical users love
  • Good for cross-functional collaboration
  • Strong automation and rules engine

Weaknesses

  • Expensive compared to alternatives
  • Free tier is quite limited
  • Can be too generic for software development
  • Performance slows with large projects

Shortcut

Strengths

  • Right balance of features without Jira's complexity
  • Clean, intuitive interface
  • Good API and integrations
  • Generous free tier

Weaknesses

  • Smaller market share means less community content
  • Fewer advanced reporting features than Jira
  • Brand confusion from name change (was Clubhouse)
  • Limited customization compared to Jira

The bottom line

Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Asana's free plan: Free for up to 10 users, limited views. Shortcut's free plan: Free for up to 10 users. When you outgrow the free tier, Shortcut is the cheaper option at $8.50/user/mo vs. $10.99/user/mo for Asana — roughly 29% less.

Feature gaps: Asana offers Automations, Forms and Goals that Shortcut lacks. Shortcut brings API, Epics and Iterations that Asana does not have.

Team fit: Asana is geared toward mid-size teams teams, while Shortcut is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Where each tool shines: Asana's biggest strengths are: multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar. intuitive interface that non-technical users love. Shortcut's biggest strengths are: right balance of features without jira's complexity. clean, intuitive interface.

Watch out for: With Asana, users commonly note that expensive compared to alternatives. With Shortcut, the main complaint is that smaller market share means less community content.

Choose Asana if...

  • You need a tool built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views
  • You specifically need Automations and Forms
  • You care about intuitive interface that non-technical users love
  • Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Asana is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users, limited views

Choose Shortcut if...

  • You need a tool built for mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light
  • You want to save on per-user costs — Shortcut is $2.49/user/mo cheaper
  • You specifically need API and Epics
  • You care about clean, intuitive interface
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Shortcut is designed for

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more