Asana vs Shortcut
Asana is work management platform for teams to organize, track, and manage projects, while Shortcut is project management for software teams with a focus on simplicity and collaboration. Shortcut comes in cheaper, but price alone does not tell the full story. Asana is built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views, whereas Shortcut targets mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light.
At a glance
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Cross-functional teams that need multiple project views | Mid-size software teams that find Jira too heavy and Trello too light |
| Starting price | $10.99/user/mo | $8.50/user/mo |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — |
| API | — | ✓ |
| Automations | ✓ | — |
| Epics | — | ✓ |
| Forms | ✓ | — |
| Goals | ✓ | — |
| Iterations | — | ✓ |
| Milestones | — | ✓ |
| Portfolios | ✓ | — |
| Stories | — | ✓ |
| Timeline View | ✓ | — |
Asana
Strengths
- Multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar
- Intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- Good for cross-functional collaboration
- Strong automation and rules engine
Weaknesses
- Expensive compared to alternatives
- Free tier is quite limited
- Can be too generic for software development
- Performance slows with large projects
Shortcut
Strengths
- Right balance of features without Jira's complexity
- Clean, intuitive interface
- Good API and integrations
- Generous free tier
Weaknesses
- Smaller market share means less community content
- Fewer advanced reporting features than Jira
- Brand confusion from name change (was Clubhouse)
- Limited customization compared to Jira
The bottom line
Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Asana's free plan: Free for up to 10 users, limited views. Shortcut's free plan: Free for up to 10 users. When you outgrow the free tier, Shortcut is the cheaper option at $8.50/user/mo vs. $10.99/user/mo for Asana — roughly 29% less.
Feature gaps: Asana offers Automations, Forms and Goals that Shortcut lacks. Shortcut brings API, Epics and Iterations that Asana does not have.
Team fit: Asana is geared toward mid-size teams teams, while Shortcut is aimed at small teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Where each tool shines: Asana's biggest strengths are: multiple views: list, board, timeline, calendar. intuitive interface that non-technical users love. Shortcut's biggest strengths are: right balance of features without jira's complexity. clean, intuitive interface.
Watch out for: With Asana, users commonly note that expensive compared to alternatives. With Shortcut, the main complaint is that smaller market share means less community content.
Choose Asana if...
- You need a tool built for cross-functional teams that need multiple project views
- You specifically need Automations and Forms
- You care about intuitive interface that non-technical users love
- Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Asana is designed for
- The free tier works for you: free for up to 10 users, limited views
Choose Shortcut if...
- You need a tool built for mid-size software teams that find jira too heavy and trello too light
- You want to save on per-user costs — Shortcut is $2.49/user/mo cheaper
- You specifically need API and Epics
- You care about clean, intuitive interface
- Your team size fits the small teams profile Shortcut is designed for
Looking for more options?
Related comparisons
Stay sharp
price changes, and honest takes — weekly.