At a glance

Activepieces Raycast
Best for Teams wanting open-source workflow automation Mac power users wanting a productivity launcher
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
100+ Integrations
AI
Clipboard History
Code Steps
Extensions
Self-Hosted
Snippets
Visual Builder

Activepieces

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Includes Visual Builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API

Raycast

Strengths

  • Includes Extensions as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Includes Snippets as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Free for individuals — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes ai alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Fewer built-in features means you may need additional tools to cover gaps
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Activepieces and Raycast are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Activepieces offers 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Self-Hosted that Raycast lacks. Raycast brings AI, Clipboard History and Extensions that Activepieces does not have.

Team fit: Activepieces is geared toward small teams teams, while Raycast is aimed at individual users and small setups. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Raycast is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows. Raycast's biggest strengths are: includes extensions as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows. includes snippets as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.

Watch out for: With Activepieces, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Raycast, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Activepieces if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
  • You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Activepieces is designed for

Choose Raycast if...

  • You need a tool built for mac power users wanting a productivity launcher
  • You specifically need AI and Clipboard History
  • You care about includes snippets as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Your team size fits the individuals profile Raycast is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for individuals

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more