At a glance

Activepieces Pipedream
Best for Teams wanting open-source workflow automation Developers wanting code-first workflow automation
Starting price Free Free
Free tier
Open source
Free tier available
Open source
100+ Integrations
1000+ Integrations
API Access
Code Steps
Cron Triggers
Self-Hosted
Visual Builder

Activepieces

Strengths

  • Open source and transparent
  • Includes Visual Builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Fully open-source — you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in
  • The core product is free with no paywalled essentials

Weaknesses

  • May lack some advanced features
  • Self-hosting is free but requires server maintenance and DevOps knowledge
  • Self-hosting requires Linux admin skills and ongoing server maintenance
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API

Pipedream

Strengths

  • Includes Code Steps as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Includes API Access as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Free for 100 runs/day — generous enough for most small teams to get real work done
  • Includes 1000+ integrations alongside the core feature set — fewer separate tools needed

Weaknesses

  • Free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade
  • Developer-oriented tooling may not suit non-technical team members
  • Complex automations can break silently if a connected service changes its API
  • Limited team/admin features if your organization eventually scales up

The bottom line

Pricing: Both Activepieces and Pipedream are free. You can try both without spending a dollar.

Feature gaps: Activepieces offers 100+ Integrations, Self-Hosted and Visual Builder that Pipedream lacks. Pipedream brings 1000+ Integrations, API Access and Cron Triggers that Activepieces does not have. Both share Code Steps.

Team fit: Activepieces is geared toward small teams teams, while Pipedream is aimed at individual users and small setups. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.

Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Pipedream is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows. Pipedream's biggest strengths are: includes code steps as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows. includes api access as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.

Watch out for: With Activepieces, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Pipedream, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

Choose Activepieces if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Self-Hosted
  • You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Your team size fits the small teams profile Activepieces is designed for

Choose Pipedream if...

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting code-first workflow automation
  • You specifically need 1000+ Integrations and API Access
  • You care about includes api access as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
  • Your team size fits the individuals profile Pipedream is designed for
  • The free tier works for you: free for 100 runs/day

Looking for more options?

Related comparisons

Explore more